Categories
Evidence

Astronauts on Apollo 8 Saw Evidence of God’s Existence

Categories
Apologetics Evolution Video

Does Evolution Explain the Origin of Life?

Categories
Apologetics Issues LGBT/Transgender

Is LGBQ Biblical?

Categories
Apologetics

Why Should God Allow You Into Heaven?

Categories
Christianity Video

It all goes back in the box

Categories
Climate Change Current Events Elite/NWO End Times Recommended

The Future of Humanity

[vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Apologetics Christianity COVID Recommended Salvation

Priests speak out: the moral case against vaccine passports

Leaders in England are getting ready to force church’s to exclude people who have not been vaccinated. 1200 church leaders sent a letter of dissent to the Prime Minister. The dissent is based on three issues:

  1. Medically illogical
  2. Morally divisive
  3. Theologically impossible

Many great issues are brought up in this video. It’s well worth a listen.

 

Categories
Bible Prophesy End Times

End Times Prophesies Being Fulfilled Today

Perhaps the best known end times Bible prophesy is known as “the mark of the beast”. Speaking of the end times the Bible says this:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Revelation 13:17

Until recently, it was hard to imagine this level of control. But recent technological advances make it easy to see that the ability to track everyone and control their ability to buy or sell is where we are heading. COVID-19 is a monumental leap in this direction with billions of people willing to trade freedom for security. Billions of people across the world believe it’s okay for leaders to force us to take a vaccine. Is it hard to see a vaccine mandate conditioning people to take the next step?

Here is the part that is hard to ignore. A cartoon on Netflix conditions children to take the “smart mark”, and says “a new world order is inevitable”, also an end times Bible prophesy. Click below to see Netflix video.

 

This cartoon tells children how wonderful the “smart mark” is. Why? You might be tempted to think this is just a coincidence. But history has proven hundreds of Bible prophesies have been fulfilled exactly as we were told.

The question then arises as to whether a person who has received the mark of the beast can be forgiven. The answer to this question seems to be “no.” Revelation 14:10–11, describing the fate of someone who takes the mark of the beast, declares,

He also will drink the wine of God’s wrath, poured full strength into the cup of his anger, and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name.

The eternal destiny of those who take the mark of the beast is the lake of fire. Why is taking the mark of the beast a damnable sin against God? Why would God condemn a person to hell for taking the mark of the beast? It would appear that taking the mark of the beast will be a blasphemous act of willful defiance against God. Receiving the mark of the beast is essentially worshiping Satan. Those who take the mark have made the choice to serve Satan rather than obey God and receive Christ as Savior. When people make that decision during the tribulation, God will grant their request to be eternally separated from Him.

Categories
COVID News

Pandemic of the vaccinated

A study done by Pfizer, internally, and revealed by a whistleblower, shows that people who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine cause recipients to become 300% more susceptible to contracting COVID-19 than unvaccinated people do. That goes against the official narrative of every government in the world.

The actors and crew of the Broadway show “Aladdin” were very excited when Broadway reopened after the lockdowns. But after just one shows, it was shut down because the majority of the actors and crew got COVID. This in spite of the fact that they are all vaccinated.

The state of Maine is the third highest in the percentage of vaccinated. Still, the hospitals are overflowing.

A former Notre Dame professor who routinely attacked unvaccinated people as selfish, recently passed away. 67 year old Karen Heisler received her first Pfizer COVID vaccine on January 13th 2021. She died on September, right after getting her booster shot. She died of cardiac complications and brain clots. The last thing that Karen Crowe Heisler ever tweeted was “damn the unvaccinated”. Don’t you find that ironic?

Far left liberal commentator on CNN, Mark Lamont Hill is one of those people that hates unvaccinated people. So he did his full duty and went out and got fully vaccinated. What do you think happened after former CNN commentator Mark Lamont Hill became fully vaccinated? He developed blood clots, and he had a heart attack at the age of 50 years old. Does that make you want to run out and and get vaccinated? Are you starting to see somewhat of a pattern here?

Senators Elizabeth Warren, and Cory Booker, test positive despite being fully vaccinated and boosted.

COVID outbreak reported on Royal Caribbean Cruise despite everyone being vaccinated and boosted.

Maryland Governor tests positive for COVID despite being fully vaccinated and boosted.

People love to blame the unvaccinated for everything, all across America and around the world we seem to have a pandemic of the vaccinated.

Categories
Christianity Issues News

Christian women's shelter won't be forced to admit trans-identified males, federal judge rules

Hope Center
The Downtown Soup Kitchen Hope Center of Anchorage, Alaska |

Amid a yearslong legal battle, a federal judge ruled this week that the city of Anchorage, Alaska’s nondiscrimination ordinance barring LGBT discrimination does not force a Christian battered women’s shelter to admit trans-identified biological males. 

In an order handed down Monday, Judge Sharon Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska determined that Downtown Soup Kitchen Hope Center of Anchorage does not have the standing to sue the city over a revision to its ordinance declaring that places of public accommodation can’t discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity because the center is not a place of public accommodation. 

Therefore, the faith-based homeless shelter created to serve battered women fleeing domestic abuse and homeless women, part of a ministry to the underprivileged that includes a soup kitchen, will not have to admit trans-identified males.

Gleason granted in part a motion from the city to dismiss the case due to lack of standing as the municipality contends that the statute does not apply to the Hope Center’s shelter operations. According to the ruling, the city cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling this past summer in favor of a Catholic foster care agency removed from Philadelphia’s foster program over policies preventing placement of children with same-sex couples.  

The municipality contended that the Supreme Court ruling “makes clear that Hope Center is not a public accommodation.”

The judge ruled that the Hope Center “may seek damages for its self-censorship based on that provision for the limited time period between the ordinance’s passage and the Municipality’s disavowal of prosecutorial intent” because “section 5.20.020 arguably
applies to Hope Center’s conduct.”

Attorneys for Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative religious liberty legal nonprofit representing the center, praised the judge’s order.

“Vulnerable women deserve a safe place to stay overnight, and we’re pleased that they can sleep soundly, at least for the time being, due to the court’s order,” ADF Senior Counsel Kate Anderson said in a statement. “Downtown Hope Center serves everyone, but its overnight women’s shelter exists to provide a safe place for women, many of whom have survived sex trafficking, rape, or domestic violence at the hands of men.” 

Anderson said that Anchorage officials have twice “targeted the center for operating according to its religious beliefs and for serving the city’s homeless population.”

She hopes that “the court’s order puts an end to this.” 

“Faith-based nonprofits should be free to serve consistently with their faith without fear of unjust government punishment,” stated Ryan Tucker, director of ADF’s Center for Christian Ministries. “This is especially true for ministries that help homeless women who have suffered sexual abuse or domestic violence. Because no woman should be forced to disrobe next to a man, we are pleased the court has allowed Downtown Hope Center to continue protecting women and operating according to its religious beliefs.”

Monday’s decision stems from years of litigation that began when a trans-identified male, referred to as “Jessie Doe” in the lawsuit, filed a complaint with Anchorage’s Equal Rights Commission in 2018.

Doe alleged that Downtown Soup Kitchen Hope Center violated the Anchorage Municipal Code by refusing admission to the shelter. Doe allegedly showed up drunk and injured. The charity contends that it referred Doe to a hospital and paid for a taxi ride.

At the time, the municipal code declared it unlawful for a place of public accommodation to “refuse, withhold from or deny to a person any of its accommodations, advantages, facilities, benefits, privileges, services or goods of that place on account of … sex [or] gender identity.”

The Equal Rights Commission filed a complaint against Downtown Soup Kitchen Hope Center, accusing it of unlawful discrimination. 

Later that year, the center filed a lawsuit against the city. ADF insisted in a legal brief that the shelter did not have to abide by the nondiscrimination provision because it was not a public accommodation but a religious ministry.

While a federal court sided with Downtown Soup Kitchen Hope Center in 2019 and city officials subsequently dropped their lawsuit on behalf of Doe, the city amended the municipal code earlier this year in what religious liberty advocates saw as an attempt to force the shelter to admit trans-identified males. 

The Anchorage Assembly altered the definition of “public accommodation” to include facilities “of any kind, whether licensed or not, whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations are made available to the general public.” Previously, the definition of “public accommodation” only applied to a “business” or “professional activity.” 

In a previous interview with The Christian Post, attorney Christy Allen alleged that Anchorage was “displeased” with the earlier court ruling finding that “the initial laws did not apply to Downtown Hope Center” and “they rewrote the law to basically include homeless shelters within those definitions.” The change to the definition prompted the Downtown Hope Center to file another lawsuit against the city, the claims of which Gleason addressed in her Monday ruling.

Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Post. He can be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com