In the latest example of “transanity,” a biological male swimmer is smashing the women’s swimming records at the University of Pennsylvania. And this is supposed to be a cause for rejoicing, yet another example of inclusion and tolerance. To the contrary point, it is the latest example of a society that has lost touch with reality. And once again, it is women who are being hurt in the process.
The case at hand involves Will (“Lia”) Thomas, who previously competed as a man at the same university prior to COVID, as recently as November 2019. At that time, according to the Washington Examiner, “Thomaswas a second-team All-Ivy swimmer in three different events.” Now, he is smashing Ivy League women’s records.
So, from being a second-team male swimmer, he has now become a female champion, smashing the ladies’ hard-earned records.
But of course, there’s no difference between a male-to-female transgender and a biological female. Not at all.
Thomas has no unfair advantage.
And the emperor has no clothes.
And I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell.
Really now, have we totally lost our minds?
I actually wrote the words “the emperor has no clothes” before reading these next paragraphs in the Examiner article, written by Zachary Faria: “We have already seen a man well past his physical prime taking a spot at the Olympics away from a 21-year-old female athlete. Now, a man who was winning against men just two years ago is dominating women’s swimming in the Ivy League, all because sports leagues and organizations are rejecting basic biology in favor of scientifically illiterate gender ideology.
“This is only going to get worse, as the Olympics have now signaled their support for more men to compete in women’s events. While transgender activists continue to promote the idea that men can be women by simply identifying as such, corporations are refusing to grow a spine. Refusing to admit that the emperor has no clothes, they instead opt to stay silent.”
It looks like we are in sync. And yes, there is a reason I call this “transanity.” It is not to attack those struggling with gender confusion but to expose the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of our culture. At what point do we, as a society, cry foul?
As documented in the NY Post, “At a meet including Princeton and Cornell on Nov. 20, Thomas had a 1:43:47 time in the 200-meter freestyle and 4:35:06 in the 500-meter freestyle.”
Not only did Thomas win the events, but he smashed the Ivy League records.
Had he been competing against other men on the national level, he would have been way off the best times, with the record for 200 meters being 1:29.15 and the record for 500 meters being 4:07.97.
But against women, it’s totally different, with the female national record for 200 meters being 1:39.10 and the 500-meter record being 4:24.06.
So, against the men, even as a good male collegiate swimmer, he is nowhere near the top. Against the women, he is a star.
But, to repeat, he has no unfair advantage.
Anyone who would make that outrageous claim is a transphobic bigot.
And if you dare to refer to Thomas as a biological male – which he is, throughout his cellular structure and DNA – you will find yourself in hot water on social media. Dare to “deadname” him and refer to him as Will, and you might just find yourself banned.
And who are the real victims in all this?
First, the women against whom he is competing. These young ladies have pushed themselves to the limit in the pool for years in order to fulfill their dreams, only to have those dreams smashed by a male.
Second, the gender-confused children who will continue to be fed lies by society, from the mouths of the media to the medical profession to the world of sports, and believe that they should start to “transition” as soon as possible.
Third, Will Thomas himself, deluded into believing that he can actually become a woman and that his athletic accomplishments should be hailed. Surely, God has a better plan for him. One that will help him achieve wholeness from the inside out. One that will not involve hormone therapies (and surgeries?) for the rest of his life. One that will make his athletic accomplishments all the more satisfying.
Ah, but these days, to say that a bigger, stronger male should not be competing against smaller, less strong females is a sign of ignorance. And advocating for something better than surgeries and unnatural hormone therapies is a sign of hatred. And standing up for women’s equality is a sign of bigotry.
God help us to wake up to reality before we completely self-destruct.
Canada isn’t just a post-Christian nation — it’s an anti-Christian nation. And it’s past time we Canadian Christians accepted that.
Earlier this year, Canada fined and imprisoned several Canadians for faithfully pastoring their churches throughout COVID lockdowns and restrictions.
Now, Canada is passing a bill that will fine and imprison Canadians for faithfully preaching what the Bible says about homosexuality and transgenderism.
On Wednesday, Canada’s House of Chambers unanimously passed Bill C-4, a bill that if — or when it passes in the Senate, will make conversion therapy an illegal offense punishable by up to five years in prison.
“Conversion therapy means a practice, treatment or service designed to:
a. change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual;
b.Change a person’s gender identity to cisgender;
c.Change a person’s gender expression so that it conforms to the sex assigned to the person at birth;
d.Repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour;
e.Repress a person’s non-cisgender gender identity; or
f.Repress or reduce a person’s gender expression that does not conform to the sex assigned to the person at birth.”
Therefore, anyone who influences a person to undergo conversion therapy or provides conversion therapy to that person could be fined or sentenced to up to five years in prison. And anyone who promotes conversion therapy could be fined or sentenced to up to two years in prison.
According to the bill: “conversion therapy causes harm to society because, among other things, it is based on and propagates myths and stereotypes about sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, including the myth that heterosexuality, cisgender gender identity, and gender expression that conforms to the sex assigned to a person at birth are to be preferred over other sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions … in light of those harms, it is important to discourage and denounce the provision of conversion therapy in order to protect the human dignity and equality of all Canadians.”
In other words, the Canadian government believes the Bible is filled with harmful myths about homosexuality and transgenderism — therefore, it is necessary to strip freedom of expression and freedom of religion from Canadian Christians.
Of course, the conversion therapy ban isn’t explicitly directed at Christians. However, LGBTQ activists in Canada have explicitly targeted Christians in their campaigns against conversion therapy.
Though many Canadian churches are either accepting or silent on homosexuality or transgenderism, Canadian Christians are still the most conservative Canadians on LGBTQ issues. Therefore, similar to the COVID lockdowns and restrictions, Bill-C4 primarily threatens the fundamental freedoms of Canadian churches and Christians.
Canada isn’t the first nation to introduce some form of bill against conversion therapy. However, from my research on conversion therapy bans across the world — Canada’s conversion therapy ban would be indisputably the most authoritative and severe ban yet.
Other than Canada (and Australia earlier this year), essentially every conversion therapy ban in other nations is explicitly related to psychotherapy or coercion.
Therefore when Bill C-4 becomes law, anyone who preaches what the Bible says about homosexuality and transgenderism could be sentenced to up to five years in prison.
“You’re not homophobic or transphobic if you share Biblical truth with LGBTQ people. You’re homophobic or transphobic if you have a phobia of sharing Biblical truth with LGBTQ people.”
However, when Bill C-4 passes, sharing Biblical truth with LGBTQ people in Canada could make you a criminal.
That includes pastors and Christian counselors who believe what the Bible says about homosexuality and transgenderism.
Pastors and Biblical counselors who teach that homosexuality and transgenderism are unnatural and sinful thoughts and behaviors could be sentenced to prison. Christians who attempt to help homosexual and transgender people repent from their sins so they can have freedom in Christ might lose their freedom and be sentenced to prison.
This is because Canada isn’t a post-Cristian nation — it’s an anti-Christian nation. Meaning, it isn’t a conservative nation either. Canada is also a post-conservative nation.
Canada has a federal party that calls itself the Conservative Party. But we do not have a conservative party — not anymore. They are conservative in name only.
Not only did a Conservative MP make the motion to fast-track Bill C-4 — there wasn’t even one dissenting voice from the 119 Conservative MP’s at the House of Commons.
The motion received unanimous approval from the House of Commons, prompting the entire House to erupt in cheers and hugs — despite their supposed concerns over Omicron. And Canada’s relatively small conservative media is either supportive or silent about this.
Soon I will be engaging in criminal behavior if I write that homosexual and transgender people need to repent of their sins and believe in Jesus Christ. And yet, the Conservative Party is celebrating over that.
That’s the state of conservatism in Canada — that’s the state of Christianity in Canada.
If it’s criminal to convert homosexual and transgender people to Christianity, why isn’t it criminal to convert other kinds of sinners to Christianity as well? But considering what the government says about supposedly harmful myths, perhaps the Canadian government is only a short time away from banning Christians from attempting to convert anyone with the Gospel.
Nevertheless, I am not afraid of what Canada will do to Christians. I’m afraid of what God will do to Canada. Canada isn’t just persecuting Christians, it’s persecuting Christ — and it won’t win.
Please pray for Christians in Canada. Please pray for Canadian pastors and Biblical counselors. And please pray for Canada.
Samuel Sey is a Ghanaian-Canadian who lives in Brampton, a city just outside of Toronto. He is committed to addressing racial, cultural, and political issues with biblical theology, and always attempts to be quick to listen and slow to speak.
Be careful where you allow your mind to wander. If it gets lost, you might never get it back.
God has established boundary lines for our protection, and when we violate these boundaries, we bring harm to ourselves and others.
Progressive theology balks at the idea of biblical absolutes. And this propensity toward relativism prompts progressives to deliberately tamper with the boundary lines on these key biblical doctrines:
The supreme authority and truthfulness of Scripture
Salvation only through repentance and faith in Jesus
Christ’s atoning sacrifice on the cross for sinners
The bodily resurrection of Christ
The virgin birth of Christ
The reality of Heaven and Hell
God’s design for gender and sexuality
These biblical boundary lines were established by God and are therefore immovable. If you disregard any of these theological absolutes, you start to slide down a slippery slope. As the dominoes begin to fall, your confidence in the Word of God becomes increasingly weaker.
Pornography, like progressive theology, is a counterfeit. These wicked bedfellows each create their own highly addictive fantasy world. Progressive theology is make-believe biblical revisionism, and pornography enslaves those who reject God’s boundary lines regarding their thought life and viewing habits.
Wisdom calls out: “My son, give me your heart and let your eyes keep to my ways” (Proverbs 23:26). Job declared, “I made a covenant with my eyes not to look lustfully at a young woman” (Job 31:1).
Internet pornography is the most readily accessible form of sexual stimulus ever invented. With one click, a bevy of erotic and arousing images instantly display themselves for man’s eyes and mind to feast upon. But it comes at an enormous cost.
Porn fuels anger and aggression, while dismantling marriages and turning hearts away from Christ. God designed sex for mutual satisfaction in marriage between a man and a woman. Lurid sexual fantasies, on the other hand, greatly diminish one’s ability to experience sexual fulfillment in marriage.
One former porn addict wrote, “I thought because I was more of an occasional user of porn that I didn’t have a problem. Boy was I wrong!” Sexual desire runs amok if your mind is allowed to wander into the danger zone.
Gary Wilson wrote a book titled, “Your Brain on Porn: Internet Pornography and the Emerging Science of Addiction.” He writes, “You have to be OK with the idea that you will never watch porn ever again in your life. If this idea gives you anxiety or makes you cringe, then you don’t have the ‘Porn is NOT an Option’ mindset yet.”
Jesus said, “Your eye is the lamp of your body. When your eyes are healthy, your whole body also is full of light. But when they are unhealthy, your body also is full of darkness” (Luke 11:34).
If you fill your heart and mind with sexual lust, it is only a matter of time before you will likely engage in sexual sin with your body as well. Scripture declares, “Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body” (1 Cor. 6:18).
Since sexual sin is the only sin against your own body, the consequences tend to be severe. Scripture provides this warning: “Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned?” (Proverbs 6:27).
A recent headline announced that a tech billionaire “kept a spreadsheet of 5,000 women he had slept with.” It reminds me of two iconic songs: “I Can’t Get No Satisfaction” (The Rolling Stones), and “I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For” (U2). Money and sexual immorality never satisfy the soul.
Jesus Christ forgives sins and sets captives free from sexual lust. Heath Lambert said, “Until God is your chief concern — until sinning against Him is what makes your heart break — you will never turn the corner.” He also said, “Jesus’ grace to change you is stronger than pornography’s power to destroy you. Jesus’ grace is stronger than your own desires to watch sex.”
“For the grace of God has appeared that offers salvation to all people. It teaches us to say ‘No’ to ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age” (Titus 2:11,12).
You were created in God’s image as body, soul, and spirit (1 These. 5:23). The Bible is the owner’s manual that explains how your body and soul can operate properly and function smoothly. Viewing porn will scramble your brain, abuse your mind and harden your heart. You could compare it to pouring Coca-Cola into the gas tank of your car.
Filling your mind with Scripture, on the other hand, is essential if you want to be set free from porn addiction. Christians are called and empowered to “take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ” (2 Cor. 10:5).
“Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable — if anything is excellent or praiseworthy — think about such things” (Philippians 4:8).
The toxic fantasies associated with porn are a powerful undercurrent in a mighty river. Meditating on God’s Word, while saying “no” to ungodliness and worldly passions, is the only way to avoid drowning in sexual lust. Check out my 2015 CP op-ed, “How Porn Prevents Christians from Being Filled with the Holy Spirit.”
Progressive theology incites people to doubt God’s Word, which leads to doubts about God’s promise of everlasting life through faith in Christ (John 3:16). Likewise, pornography leads people further and further from the Lord as it defiles the heart and fuels an ever-increasing addiction to sexual lust.
God has established boundary lines for our protection. Those who choose to violate these boundaries do so to their own peril.
Dan Delzell is the pastor of Redeemer Lutheran Church in Papillion, Nebraska.
One of the members of the Church Answers’ community started a discussion that I absolutely loved. After some lengthy prefatory comments, he asked the community: When things are tough, when you feel like you have no more to give, what are some of the things that keep you moving forward?
His post created a great discussion. I jumped in with the realization that, beginning in 2022, I will have been in vocational ministry for 40 years. Those 40 years are divided almost into equal thirds: pastor, seminary dean, and CEO of a Christian resource company. Two quick thoughts hit me. First, I am old. Second, I’ve learned a few lessons.
For sure, I’ve made many mistakes. I hope I’ve learned from these mistakes more than I have repeated them. In the discussion at Church Answers, I named eight of the lessons. For this article, I added a few more.
The spiritual disciplines are not only acts of obedience for me, but they are also necessary for my spiritual and emotional survival. When I am not praying, reading the Word, or sharing the Gospel, I am more likely to be discouraged and even despondent.
An optimistic (hope and faith-based, of course) attitude seems to be a differentiating factor for many in ministry who persevere.
True friends are priceless anywhere and particularly in ministry.
It’s even better that my sons and my wife are my best friends.
Comparison to others in ministry is an emotional killer. Don’t do it.
Laughter is a key trait to longevity.
Apologize and ask for forgiveness quickly.
Don’t be snarky and critical, especially on social media.
Most crises are not true crises. Give it a week or so, and your perspective will change.
Don’t make major decisions when you are tired.
Don’t denigrate others. It is a sign of your own insecurities.
Silence is often the best response.
Love the church where God has you. The members are not perfect, but neither are you.
Work hard and work smart. Others are watching you. Set the example.
Don’t forget God’s call on your life and your ministry. It will be the single factor that keeps you going at times.
I would love to hear your perspective. When things are tough, when you feel like you have no more to give, what are some of the things that keep you moving forward?
Thom S. Rainer is the founder and CEO of Church Answers, an online community and resource for church leaders. Prior to founding Church Answers, Rainer served as president and CEO of LifeWay Christian Resources.
A.W. Tozer was famous for saying, “It is doubtful whether God can bless a man greatly until He has hurt him deeply.” Brokenness is painful, but it develops humility and dependence on God that very few experience.
In the same way that olives are crushed for their expensive oil and flowers for their perfume, we too must be humbled before we can be mightily used by God. If He is breaking you, although it may be challenging, rejoice in the refining process. Isaiah 66:2 reminds us that God will look on him “who is poor and of a contrite spirit.”
God, when is this over?
I’ll never forget the day I drove to the corporate office of 24 Hour Fitness and resigned as a district manager. According to the world’s standard, I had it all: A custom home on the west side and a six-figure income, all while in my 20s. While I had focused on prosperity, wealth and success, I had starved my soul. I tried everything that the world had to offer, but ultimately, I found that it offered little of lasting value. Through a series of events, God humbled me, and that’s an understatement. In short, the prodigal came home, but that was just the beginning of the breaking process (Hear more here).
Within six months of leaving my eight-year profession, I had to move back home with my mom, which was embarrassing for a “self-made” man. Was God finally done breaking me? Not yet. I went to work as a laborer digging up septic tank lids by hand. Each day I would set out with my digging bar and shovel. While listening to sermons and teachings, I would spend the rest of the day digging. It was my portable seminary. Looking back, it was one of the most productive, relaxing and joy-filled times of my life because I surrendered everything to God.
For months, people would gasp, “Shane, what in the world are you doing? Why did you leave all that?” Although it was hard, the process of breaking my pride was God-sent. Humility is a life-long struggle for all of us. We must remain teachable and repent when warranted. The more God fills you the more He can use you. He desires humility and brokenness over ability and gifting. He doesn’t call the qualified; He qualifies the called.
Strength comes from weakness
As a person who struggles with dyslexia and reading disabilities (also part of the breaking process), and having graduated high school with a 1.8 GPA, I should not be writing op-eds on the national level or speaking to tens of thousands on the radio and other media outlets. My critics laugh at me, but many others are encouraged. They think, “If God can use Shane Idleman, He can use me, too, if I repent and turn to Him.”
The sooner we realize that we are flawed and broken, and utterly dependent on God, the sooner we will experience true joy. Joy and strength in God come from weakness and dependence — broken, yet unbreakable (cf. 2 Cor. 12:9-11). And make no mistake, because pride desperately tries to regain lost ground, the breaking process can be a life-long struggle. I wrote more about that here.
Weep before you whip
Leonard Ravenhill coined the short, but powerful phrase: “We must weep before we whip.” He was referencing the fact that Jesus first wept over Jerusalem before driving out the money changer. The principle is profound: True spiritual power and God-given authority must be preceded by brokenness, compassion, and humility. This is the refiner’s fire and the furnace of affliction spoken about throughout the sacred text of Scripture (cf. Rev. 3:18; Ma. 3:3; Ps. 26:2, etc.).
Think about the most spiritual Christian you know or have read about (notice I didn’t say the most popular). I guarantee their anointing came from pain and brokenness rather than pride and arrogance. Remember, before God can use a man greatly, he must hurt him deeply by crushing his pride. Even David, after being anointed king, had to go back and tend to the sheep. He had to be a keeper before a king.
It will cost you
It is my firm belief that arrogance in the church is preventing a mighty downpour of God’s Spirit. We need the blessing of brokenness like never before. The disciples had to be crushed like olives so the anointing oil could flow. Paul had to be knocked down and blinded before he was humbled enough to ask, “What shall I do, Lord?” (Acts 22:10).
Make no mistake: The anointing that comes through brokenness will cost you. The old saints understood that the only way to prevail was to travail. Deep, heart-searching change is painful and laborious, as well as physically and mentally exhausting. Isaiah even paralleled childbirth with seeking God, “As a woman with child is in pain and cries out in her pangs, when she draws near the time of her delivery, so have we been in Your sight, O Lord” (Isaiah 26:17). There is always travail before you prevail.
God hears the cries of his children. “When God decides to recover a ruined situation, he finds a praying man and baptizes him in anguish” (David Wilkerson). The flame in the upper room still burns. The choice is yours: Will you lay hold of it and continue to fan the flames with brokenness and humility, or quench the Spirit’s fire through pride?
What a travesty it would be at the end of our journey to find that pride robbed us of the blessing of brokenness.
A Pennsylvania church was vandalized by unknown assailants who desecrated the property with graffiti depicting satanic symbols and the words “kill God.”
The Lititz Church of the Brethren in Lancaster County was vandalized sometime between Thursday evening and Friday morning, police said, according to The Morning Call.
The chalk graffiti displayed the phrases “kill God” and “hail Satan,” as well as the satanic symbol of a star inside a circle. The vandalism also featured the number 666, the biblical number for the Antichrist.
Eric Landram, the lead pastor of Lititz Church of the Brethren, told The Christian Post on Monday that the “chalk which was used left no permanent damage and clean up was minimal.”
Landram explained that such vandalism has not occurred on his church’s property in the past, so they are “are treating it as a one-time prank and are not concerned by the antics.” He added that apart from “what has already been reported, we have no additional comments to make at this time.”
News of the church vandalism grabbed the attention of the editorial board for Lancaster Online, which denounced the actions as “egregiously wrong” and “especially disturbing.”
“There is something especially disturbing about vandalism directed at a place of worship or a religious symbol. It seems designed to rattle people of faith who regard their sacred spaces as sanctuaries to which they go in times of both grief and joy,” wrote the editors.
“There was no lasting damage to the church. But memories of the desecration likely will linger. Even if it turns out to be the work of clueless young people. Or the product of a disturbed mind.”
The editorial board also cited a report by Axios published in October, which concluded that houses of worship of various faiths were “experiencing high amounts of vandalism, arson and other property damage.”
“2021 is on track to exceed last year’s spike in hate crimes in the U.S., many of them linked to religious bigotry,” Axios reported.
“The number of hate crimes reported in FY 2020 was the highest since 2001, when a wave of Islamophobia followed the 9/11 attacks, according to updated FBI data.”
The late Evelyn Player, 69, was found dead at Southern Baptist Church in Baltimore, Maryland, on November 16, 2021. | Family handout
A man accused of murdering 69-year-old retiree Evelyn Player inside a bathroom at the Southern Baptist Church in East Baltimore, Maryland, should not be held criminally responsible for her death, his lawyer argued as charging documents revealed how the praying grandmother fought her attacker to stay alive.
Baltimore Police Commissioner Michael S. Harrison told reporters at a press conference last Thursday that Manzie Smith Jr., a 62-year-old ex-convict with a lengthy rap sheet, was arrested and charged with Player’s Nov. 16 murder at Southern Baptist Church.
Smith’s attorney, Warren Brown, told Fox Baltimore Monday that even though his client had not yet been indicted, Smith has no recollection of the day Player was killed. Smith plans to plea not criminally responsible, Maryland’s equivalent to an insanity defense.
Manzie Smith Jr. | Baltimore Police Department
“This is not just somebody who just decides to murder someone. I don’t know whether he did it or not, quite frankly. But I do know that if he did do it, it has to be attributed to his mental health,” Brown said.
“He has a lot of baggage, mental health issues, whether it’s schizophrenia, bipolar, delusional thoughts. He’s been in and out of various mental health hospitals.”
An autopsy report on Player cited by CBS Baltimore shows that she suffered multiple stab wounds, including on both of her hands, which suggests she tried to defend herself. Police used DNA evidence to link Smith to the crime.
“It’s not something that you can really say every time there’s a struggle. You’re going to have a lot of DNA there. But if you can, scratching someone is definitely going to get DNA under their fingernails,” Rana Dellarocco, director of the Baltimore Police Department’s Forensic Laboratories, explained to Fox Baltimore.
“If you’re lucky enough to land a good punch and the person bleeds on you, then that’s going to give DNA from that suspect that’s going to get on you.”
Southern Baptist Church pastor, Bishop Donte Hickman, told the news outlet that he was “disgusted” by the argument Smith should not be held criminally responsible.
“I’m disgusted by that characterization of a man who brutally took a woman’s life in our church’s restroom for the disabled,” he said in a statement. “I cannot believe that someone that did this in our church so early in the morning didn’t premeditate this evil attack.”
Brown called the pastor’s statement “an emotional response to what’s going on,” but he could “clearly understand that.”
Player’s murder has made national headlines. Community members, along with city and state officials, agreed that it was the place where she was killed that made it especially shocking.
Just hours after her murder, Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott said her death inside the independent multi-campus church her family had attended for four generations was an “unspeakable, cowardly murder.”
He described her as a “dedicated member and staff member” of the church and her killer as “cowardice scum.”
Bishop Hickman also noted in the early aftermath of Player’s death that she had been intensely praying at the church days before her killing. Hickman said she was perhaps at the church early on the day she was killed for similar devotion.
“Typically, Evelyn would not come as early. We have other male sextons that come to the church; she just beat everybody here,” he said. “She had been praying all week, praying and crying, and she may have come to the church early to have some time to pray by herself.”
President Donald Trump’s fourth Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has opened up about what took place during his year in the White House, whether he’ll cooperate with the congressional Jan. 6 investigation and what he thinks the future holds for president Donald Trump.
“I feel like there were so many from the left who were writing stories about President Trump, who candidly, were not present in the room,” Meadows told The Christian Post in a video interview on his new book, The Chief of Cheifs, released Tuesday.
Meadows, who served as a member of U.S. Congress from North Carolina for nearly seven years, sat down for an interview last week in which he discussed whether he would agree to testify before the U.S. House of Representatives select committee on the storming on the U.S. Capitol last Jan. 6.
Due to the executive privilege invoked by President Trump, the complex legal discussions were things he was unable to discuss. He did say that he was working with the committee on a number of accommodations. But on Tuesday, Meadows declared that he is no longer cooperating with the select committee’s probe, saying the committee intended to ask questions he considered “executive privilege.”
“These are obviously complex legal discussions. When it comes to the executive privilege that President Trump has claimed, that is not something that I can give up,” Meadows told CP. “That is not my privilege to give up.”
Meadows said that he does mention the events of Jan. 6 in his book, but it’s not a major focus.
“You can’t talk about the last year and not mention the January 6th incident,” the 62-year-old said. “However, spending as much time on January 6th as some of my Democrat colleagues in Congress are does not portray the right decision. I think the breach of the Capitol security came as a surprise to everyone in the West Wing. I know that many on the left want to suggest otherwise. But that is not the case. We talk about that, but that is not the main focus of the book.”
“I am not aware of anybody that had any advanced knowledge of a breach of security and what ultimately happened on January 6th that it was going to happen,” he said. “Many of us believed that this was President Trump’s last address to a number of supporters that was going to happen while he was president, knowing that January 20 was right around the corner. As that happened, I think a lot of us look back, and certainly, we don’t condone what happened as it relates to the breach of security there, and, in fact, condemn that. That shouldn’t have happened.”
Meadows said his time serving as the chief of staff was the “hardest job” he’s ever had.
“It was an honor of a lifetime to serve as the 45th President’s chief of staff. It was also the hardest job I have ever done,” he said. “President Trump would call at all hours of the morning and night because he didn’t sleep much. Because he didn’t sleep much meant that I didn’t sleep much. He was all about trying to get things done .”
Meadows said his time in the White House — March 2020 to January 2021 — is something he does not regret and would do again.
Meadows offered his thoughts about Trump’s future, sharing informally that he believes Trump will run for president in 2024.
“Do I believe that he would run again now? I want to make sure I am clear with this. I do not work for the president, so I do not speak on his behalf. I do talk to him a lot. I believe he is going to run,” Meadows said.
“He is putting together a team that will address that. And so, for those that are cheering on the fact that they want him to run again, they’ll be happy. For those that don’t want him to run again, they will be disappointed. Serving our country is a great honor and serving him, so prayerfully, I would … be honored if he would ask me again. Yet at the same time, knowing that it’s the hardest job that I’ve had, I would want to make sure that he’s got the best people around.”
For Meadows, the chief of staff role was one that he enjoyed and he believes he served the president and God well.
“Yeah, it was a busy year, but when I thought about our heavenly Father, it was all about honoring Him,” he said.
The man who helped design the Ark Encounter and Creation Museum attractions in Kentucky, whose craftsmanship helped unveil the refurbished Statue of Liberty in 1986, died last Thursday at 77.
At the time of his death, Patrick Marsh was vice president since 2001 of attractions design for the Young Earth creationist apologetics organization Answers in Genesis — which spearheaded the building and operating of both the museum and amusement park in Northern Kentucky.
Answers in Genesis did not disclose how he died in its announcement of Marsh’s death.
Patrick Marsh | Answers in Genesis
First opened in 2016, the Ark Encounter is a life-size Noah’s Ark model in Williamstown with dimensions given in the Genesis narrative. According to the museum’s website, the attraction spans 510 feet long, 85 feet wide and 51 feet high.
The Creation Museum, a 75,000-square-foot facility located about an hour’s drive south in Petersburg, was established in 2007. The museum allows attendees to venture through biblical history. The museum offers artistic creations, botanical gardens, a planetarium, zoo, zipline, adventure course and more.
“Patrick’s fingerprints are all over the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter,” Answers in Genesis founder and prominent Young Earth apologist Ken Ham said in a statement. “I have never worked with a more creative person. Calling him a ‘genius’ is not an overstatement. I will miss him dearly, not only as a colleague, but as a friend.”
A USA Today readers’ poll chose the Ark Encounter and Creation Museum as America’s top two faith-based attractions in 2019.
Throughout Marsh’s career as an artist, he also made widely recognized artistic designs, such as the popularized “Jaws” and “King Kong” attractions at Universal Studios in Florida and the coordination of 50 designers for the grounds of the 1984 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.
Before his death, Marsh oversaw the complete renovation of the museum’s grand Palm Plaza section, which incorporates a pro-life exhibit titled “Fearfully” and “Wonderfully Made.” He has also worked on new additions to both museums.
Marsh, who earned his bachelor’s degree in industrial design and his master’s degree in environmental design from the University of California, Los Angeles, also served as the director of design for Dream Makers in Japan.
In that position, he was responsible for the concept design of various theme parks in Asia.
“At AiG, Patrick was able to attract, build, and mentor a phenomenal team of talented younger-generation designers and artists,” Ham added. “Although Patrick can never be replaced, the team that was built under his leadership is ready to carry on his legacy.”
Marsh leaves behind his wife, Sakae, whom he met and married in Japan.
What does it mean to be pro-life? Is that different (is it better, is it worse?) than being pro-birth? Is being “just” pro-birth a bad thing? What about being “anti-abortion?”
In light of the Dobbs case being argued before the Supreme Court, the conversation about what being pro-life really means has kicked up again in Christian spaces.
The Dobbs case is the greatest challenge to the core holdings of Roe v. Wade in history thus far. At stake is the question of whether or not states have the constitutional right to impose pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions. This is the culmination of 50 years of blood, sweat and tears by the pro-life movement. There is a real — though not guaranteed — hope that the new conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court will uphold the Mississippi law at the heart of the Dobbs case and possibly even overturn Roe and its follow-on ruling, Planned Parenthood vs. Casey.
I’ve often said, hoped and prayed that I would be a part of the “pro-life generation” — the generation to end the ghastly horror of Roe and Casey, which, as Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart argued on behalf of Dobbs, “haunt our nation.” By God’s grace, and by President Trump’s election and Supreme Court picks, we appear to be on the cusp of just such a momentous occasion.
But back to the question at hand (after all, it’s been very patient as I worked through my preamble): What does it mean to be pro-life?
The question is raised because there is a certain group of Christian commentators out there who will attempt to denigrate the political activism of pro-lifers by throwing this phrase in their face: “You’re not really pro-life, you’re just pro-birth — you don’t even care what happens to the baby after it is born.”
You can see this argument here by Jemar Tisby, here by Scott Coley and here by Thabiti Anyabwile, who argues that “being anti-abortion is not the same as being pro-life.”
What do these accusations really mean? How should Christians respond? Two points to consider.
1. The pro-life movement is about stopping the legalized killing of babies in the womb; it’s not an economic agenda.
First, these Christian commentators are essentially arguing that unless you support an ever-expanding government-administered social safety net, funded by taxpayer dollars, you aren’t really “pro-life.” This is misguided for a variety of reasons. The white-hot pressing moral question at hand in our nation is not, “Will there be government-funded pre-K?,” but rather, “Are unborn children full persons deserving of life and equal protection under the law that they currently do not have in the United States?”
The debate isn’t over post-maternal care, it’s about whether or not an adult woman (or even a minor girl) is legally free to kill her child on-demand and at any moment, in some states even up until the moment of birth.
In other words, to conflate the question of stopping the unmitigated slaughter of the unborn with economic conditions or a social safety net is to miss the point. It’s essentially the same thing as arguing that we shouldn’t have rescued the captive prisoners in Nazi German concentration camps, living under the threat of imminent death in the gas chambers, unless we also supported the Marshall Plan to rebuild the European economy. Such an argument is preposterous, but let’s draw out the analogy.
Today, in America, unborn children are essentially living in the concentration camp of their mother’s womb. How so? Because at any moment the mother can take them to a Planned Parenthood or another abortion clinic — the modern-day equivalent of the Nazi gas chambers — and put them to death.
Pro-life advocates want to put an end to that. We want to remove the threat of death that hangs over the unborn. We want to liberate the modern-day Auschwitz of the womb, ensuring that children who are conceived are given the guarantee of life — enduring life in the womb and subsequent birth.
Imagine, if you will, running up to the Soviet army right before they liberated Auschwitz in 1945 and shouting, “Wait! What’s your plan to provide government-funded social safety net services for these captives? Are you really pro-life or just anti-gas chambers?”
Do you see how absurd that sounds? But that’s exactly how these Christians sound when they pillory those whom they pejoratively label as just being pro-birth.
Jon Harris in his excellent book, Christianity and Social Justice: Religions in Conflictexplains the historic background of this misguided argument. He traces it back to social justice advocates like Ron Sider. He explains:
“Another tactic of social justice evangelicals is to attach ‘quality-of-life’ issues to the ‘pro-life’ movement. Because evangelicals have a strong tradition of opposing abortion it is very difficult to convince them using the standard secular pro-abortion arguments. Instead, political progressives try to hijack the movement by adding social justice concerns and treating them as if they are just as important as breaking God’s direct command not to murder. Things like systemic racism, environmental issues, and even personal decisions like smoking are considered pro-life issues. Sider, in his 1987 book ‘Completely Pro-Life,’ was one of the first to make this argument to evangelicals. Sider defined being ‘completely pro-life’ as ‘defend[ing] human life wherever it is threatened.’ That is how he could go after pro-life Sen. Jesse Helms for inconsistency since he opposed abortion but also supported government subsidies for tobacco.”
But Harris counters Sider’s rationalization, arguing that:
“The mistake in this thinking is comparing something like smoking, a quality-of-life choice made by adults who probably also eat cheeseburgers and fail to exercise at times, with actual murder. The unlawful taking of another person’s life is very different than choosing to drink soda. One is a sin in and of itself and subject to a civil penalty in God’s law. The other could potentially be negligent, but it is an issue of personal jurisdiction and does not usually accompany an intent to immediately end one’s life.”
In other words, don’t let anyone try to tell you that you aren’t really advocating for the unborn unless you support cradle-to-grave government spending to take care of every child ever born. Quite frankly, that’s an anti-family policy on its own merits. And supporting such an expansive, socialistic vision for government is in no way a prerequisite for being pro-life.
2. Being pro-life does mean more than being pro-birth, but not how they mean it.
To recapitulate, I’m essentially arguing that being pro-life is the same as being pro-birth and it is the same as being anti-abortion. A pond, a lake and an ocean are all made of water. They might be found in different shapes and sizes, but the content is the same, salt levels notwithstanding.
But in another sense, being pro-life does mean more than being pro-birth, but not how the hecklers mean it. How so? Well, the horrifically sad reality is that quite a few abortions involve a birth — it just involves the birth of a dead baby.
Thus, when we say we are pro-life, we are acknowledging that the baby inside the womb is alive before it is born. We aren’t just advocating for “birth” — we are demanding that the laws of the United States protect the living child in the womb up until birth.
And this is a crucial distinction because once a baby is born, it is afforded all the rights and protections of U.S. law applicable to its right to life. But as it stands, those constitutional rights and protections are not afforded to the unborn. Their humanity, their dignity and their Imago Dei are wrongly denied by the unjust laws of our land simply because they haven’t completed gestation. They are out of sight, out of mind and outside the law. This must change.
So, when most Christians — those who “understand the assignment” of overturning Roe v. Wade as the sin qua non of the pro-life movement — use the phrase “pro-life,” they do mean pro-birth, but they also mean a living birth and legal protections afforded to the baby before birth.
You can’t go to school unless you are born — and born alive. You don’t need a school lunch unless you are born — and born alive. You don’t need to be adopted unless you are born — and born alive.
And you certainly don’t need social services if you are dead, dismembered and discarded in a trash bag.
So, let’s stop polluting this conversation with unhelpful distractions like “you’re just pro-birth” or “you’re just anti-abortion.” To that I respond: Yes.
As Pastor Andrew Murch recently explained in his blog post entitled “Pro-Life vs. Pro-Birth“:
“If you are not Pro-Birth, you are Pro-Insert-A-Tool-Into-A-Mother’s-Womb-To-Crush-The-Head-Of-Her-Baby-So-That-The-Baby’s-Life-Less-Body-Can-Be-Vacuumed-Out-Of-Her-Uterus. … Don’t give me your mindless platitudes about Pro-Life vs. Pro-Birth.”
So, Christian, take heart and take courage. Be proudly pro-life, pro-birth and anti-abortion. And don’t let anyone else try to shame or blame you for unapologetically advocating for the end of Roe, and the illegalization of abortion, as exponentially more important than whether or not we have taxpayer-funded social services from womb to tomb. We need to make sure the womb isn’t a tomb before we even have that conversation.
The goal of the pro-life movement is to change the law, first and foremost. Anything after that is icing on the cake. As Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and I think that’s pretty important.”
So, right now, we need the law changed so that it stops mothers from killing their unborn children. Until that happens, there isn’t much else to talk about. I don’t know about you, but I think that’s pretty important.
William Wolfe served as a senior official in the Trump administration, both as a deputy assistant secretary of defense at the Pentagon and a director of legislative affairs at the State Department. Prior to his service in the administration, Wolfe worked for Heritage Action for America, and as a congressional staffer for three different members of Congress, including the former Rep. Dave Brat. He has a B.A. in history from Covenant College, and is finishing his Masters of Divinity at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Follow William on Twitter at @William_E_Wolfe